"I'll have a counter-jihad croissant with plenty of soft nougat inside to go with my triple decaf counter-jihadaccino, please..."

Editorializing on one of his own recent Jihad Watch headlines --

Michigan: Court rules that Muslim woman in danger of honor killing in Jordan will not be sent back 

-- Robert Spencer writes:

"The ruling is good."

Here we have our American government actually deporting a Muslim from the U.S. (her student visa, which should never be issued to Muslims anyway, expired), and we have Spencer wanting this Muslim to stay.  Apparently, Spencer believes that when a Muslim is victimized by other Muslims, that victimized Muslim must be harmless and should remain in the West.

The point is not merely, nor even mainly, that this particular Muslim (Olga Jad Kamar) poses an imminent threat to Westerners; but that our Spencerian need to exude humnitarian concern for Muslim Victims (of other Muslims) only tends to reinforce, in the long run, our unwillingness to grow a rational prejudice against all Muslims, thereby helping to make sure Muslims will continue to be accepted by us as part of our broader Western sociopolitical tapestry -- which eventually, perhaps by the end of this 21st century -- will allow Muslims in the West to pull off the kind of terror attacks which will make 911 look like firecrackers at a 4th of July picnic.  Attacks of such numerous incidence, broad dispersal, and mass-destruction capability as to portend widespread disabling if not destruction of our social, economic and material infrastructures while, of course, mass-murdering perhaps millions of our men, women and children. But apparently, Spencer doesn't see the threat of Islam as being that dire.  Confessions of an Islamophobe! Can I get a ROMPRLMAO (Rolling On My Prayer Rug, Laughing My Ass Off)...?