Most of us, even pundits with podcasts and thousands of followers (yea, hundreds of thousands) on Twitter are effectively peasants, insofar as we really don't know what the Cabal is or what it's up to. While there seems to be a stratum of "Middle Management" -- people sufficiently influential and/or privy to the globalist Beltway to have at least some toehold of knowledge in this regard -- one oughtn't rely overmuch upon them for two reasons: they often haven't disentangled the complexity of the nexus between the Cabal and the Mainstream (usually because they don't even think in terms of these categories at all); and some may be controlled opposition.
At any rate, one of my big themes is the palpation of the relative weakness of the Cabal vis-Ã -vis its relative power. One can illustrate this with a variety of cases. One such case is the ongoing attempt to destroy Trump. If the Cabal was omnipotent, it would have destroyed him long ago; indeed, it wouldn't have allowed him to be President the first time. The alternative to omnipotence, of course, is not zero power; and we reasonably assume there are degrees of power short of omnipotence that still follow this logic: if Trump remains standing, this indicates interesting weakness in the Cabal, yet to be determined with precision. The only logical alternative explanation would be that Trump is controlled opposition as part of an elaborate scam. This alternative explanation we reasonably conclude is too implausible to take seriously, even if we concede its possibility.
