My previous posting ("Drill down to the very molten core of Covid") adverted to Christine Massey's ongoing project of sending Freedom of Information letters to various public health/government institutions throughout the West -- and to how not one of those institutions provided her with her request for proof of the isolation of the Covid virus.
Speaking of drilling down, I wanted to get to the core of Massey's argument, which involves
1) what she (and others she draws on) means by "isolating" a virus;
2) how it is that (according to her et al.) Mainstream science/medicine fails to provide proof of isolation not only of the Covid virus but also of "any so-called pathogenic virus"?
The readily apparent problem with the thesis of Massey et al. -- as exposited in this article for example -- is that as the layperson begins reading it, it quickly becomes too technical with biological/virological jargon for comprehension and validation of key claims woven therein. (Tellingly, when I pointed this out to Massey herself on Twitter, she dismissed my concern and effectively assumed that it's "easy to understand" for anyone.)
In this situation, it would be useful for a couple of Mainstream Covid Narrative defenders -- preferably with scientific expertise -- to attempt a refutation of the above-mentioned article, and then for its authors (Sally Morell MA, Dr. Thomas Cowan MD, and Andrew Kaufman MD) to attempt, in turn, a counter-refutation. In addition, an attempt should be made by someone with scientific expertise who is also a good communicator to the layperson (a very rare combination) to "translate" these refutations for the general public.
Will this most useful exercise be done in the near future? Given the woefully disorganized state of the Covid Dissident Movement (my term for what remains so disorganized, it still doesn't have an official name), I doubt it.
No comments:
Post a Comment